Poo-tee-weet?
This is an analytical essay I wrote on Slaughterhouse-Five in which I was assigned to analyze a quote from and show how it conveys the theme of the book.
A massacre can never be justified. In the book Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut, a man named Billy decides to write a book about his experiences in Dresden, a city in Germany that was bombed by the Allied forces in World War II in order to destroy its railroad and freight yards. As Billy relates the events, he also tells his life’s story, up until the day he dies. Billy can see the day he dies clearly because he was abducted by aliens who called themselves Tralfamadorians, and they taught Billy how to see any given moment in time as they do, otherwise known as seeing into the 4th dimension. The Dresden bombing remains to be one of the most controversial moments in the entire war because the city was almost totally destroyed and the civilian casualties were staggering (approximately 25,000 people died, although this figure has been changed many times for propaganda purposes). Vonnegut’s theme throughout the book is clear: war, and the massacres it causes, are pointless. The following quote shows how he conveys this idea: “Everything is supposed to be very quiet after a massacre, and it always is, except for the birds. And what do the birds say? All there is to say about a massacre, things like ‘Poo-tee-weet?’"
The literal and figural meanings of these words are one and the same: whatever there is to say about a massacre always comes out the same. The author’s point is made by the word ‘birds.’ Birds bring to mind innocence, peace, and calm. After the Dresden massacre, there was nothing; everything was destroyed. This brings to mind the image of a deserted wasteland. The author’s attitude is very sarcastic because he seems to make very little of what actually happened. When Vonnegut writes ‘and it always is,’ his words create emphasis on the next ones, ‘except for the birds’. There is irony in the fact that the author uses a bird tweeting to show the innocence of it after a massacre. After all, what else can a bird say?
The quote is significant because it conveys the author’s feelings toward war. Kurt Vonnegut is trying to say that war is a horrible act that should never occur. Yet at the same time, he writes “...that there would always be wars, that they were as easy to stop as glaciers. I believe that too.” So in essence, he’s saying that he can’t help wars arising, but he is firmly against them when they come about. I do not agree with this statement. Any one person can help stop a war, no matter how unimportant he may seem at first.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.






